White SW Computer Law
Intellectual Property, Information Technology & Telecommunications Lawyers
Melbourne Office - PO Box 452, COLLINS STREET WEST Victoria 8007 Australia
Sydney Office - GPO Box 2506, SYDNEY New South Wales 2001 Australia
Telephone: Melbourne Office - +61 3 9629 3709 Sydney Office - +61 2 9233 2600
Facsimile: Melbourne Office - +61 3 9629 3217 Sydney Office - +61 2 9233 3044
Email: wcl@computerlaw.com.au Internet: http://www.computerlaw.com.au

User Tools

Site Tools


trade_mark

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
trade_mark [2014/09/08 15:45]
steve [2014]
trade_mark [2017/07/30 18:03] (current)
Line 1: Line 1:
 ====== Trade Marks Information ====== ====== Trade Marks Information ======
   * [[trade_marks|How do I apply to register a trade mark and how much does it cost?]]   * [[trade_marks|How do I apply to register a trade mark and how much does it cost?]]
-====== Trade Mark Legislation ​======+===== Trade Mark Legislation =====
   * [[http://​www.austlii.edu.au/​au/​legis/​cth/​consol_act/​tma1995121/​|Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth)]]   * [[http://​www.austlii.edu.au/​au/​legis/​cth/​consol_act/​tma1995121/​|Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth)]]
     * [[http://​www.austlii.edu.au/​au/​legis/​cth/​consol_act/​tma1995121/​s7.html|s7,​ Use of trade mark]]     * [[http://​www.austlii.edu.au/​au/​legis/​cth/​consol_act/​tma1995121/​s7.html|s7,​ Use of trade mark]]
Line 11: Line 11:
   * [[http://​www.austlii.edu.au/​au/​legis/​cth/​consol_reg/​tmr1995230/​|Trade Marks Regulations 1995]]   * [[http://​www.austlii.edu.au/​au/​legis/​cth/​consol_reg/​tmr1995230/​|Trade Marks Regulations 1995]]
   * [[http://​www.ipaustralia.gov.au/​pdfs/​trademarkmanual/​trade_marks_examiners_manual.htm|IP Australia Trade Marks Office Manual of Practice and Procedure]]   * [[http://​www.ipaustralia.gov.au/​pdfs/​trademarkmanual/​trade_marks_examiners_manual.htm|IP Australia Trade Marks Office Manual of Practice and Procedure]]
-====== Trade Mark Cases ====== +===== Trade Mark Cases ===== 
-===== 2014 =====+==== 2014 ==== 
 +  * [[http://​www.austlii.edu.au/​au/​cases/​cth/​HCA/​2014/​48.html|Cantarella Bros Pty Limited v Modena Trading Pty Limited]] (([2014] HCA 48))
   * [[http://​www.austlii.edu.au/​au/​cases/​cth/​FCAFC/​2014/​75.html|Lift Shop Pty Ltd v Easy Living Home Elevators Pty Ltd]] (([2014] FCAFC 75))   * [[http://​www.austlii.edu.au/​au/​cases/​cth/​FCAFC/​2014/​75.html|Lift Shop Pty Ltd v Easy Living Home Elevators Pty Ltd]] (([2014] FCAFC 75))
   * [[http://​www.austlii.edu.au/​au/​cases/​cth/​FCA/​2014/​418.html|Phone Directories Company Australia Pty Ltd v Telstra Corporation Limited (No 2)]] (([2014] FCA 418))   * [[http://​www.austlii.edu.au/​au/​cases/​cth/​FCA/​2014/​418.html|Phone Directories Company Australia Pty Ltd v Telstra Corporation Limited (No 2)]] (([2014] FCA 418))
   * [[http://​www.austlii.edu.au/​au/​cases/​cth/​FCA/​2014/​373.html|Phone Directories Company Australia Pty Ltd v Telstra Corporation Limited]] (([2014] FCA 373))   * [[http://​www.austlii.edu.au/​au/​cases/​cth/​FCA/​2014/​373.html|Phone Directories Company Australia Pty Ltd v Telstra Corporation Limited]] (([2014] FCA 373))
-===== 2013 =====+==== 2013 ====
   * [[http://​www.austlii.edu.au/​au/​cases/​cth/​FCA/​2013/​905.html|Adidas AG v Pacific Brands Footwear Pty Ltd (No 3)]] (([2013] FCA 905))   * [[http://​www.austlii.edu.au/​au/​cases/​cth/​FCA/​2013/​905.html|Adidas AG v Pacific Brands Footwear Pty Ltd (No 3)]] (([2013] FCA 905))
   * [[http://​www.austlii.edu.au/​au/​cases/​cth/​FCA/​2013/​559.html|REA Group Ltd v Real Estate 1 Ltd]] (([2013] FCA 559))   * [[http://​www.austlii.edu.au/​au/​cases/​cth/​FCA/​2013/​559.html|REA Group Ltd v Real Estate 1 Ltd]] (([2013] FCA 559))
   * [[http://​zoeken.rechtspraak.nl/​detailpage.aspx?​ljn=BZ7844|Christian Louboutin v Van Haren B.V.]]   * [[http://​zoeken.rechtspraak.nl/​detailpage.aspx?​ljn=BZ7844|Christian Louboutin v Van Haren B.V.]]
-===== 2012 =====+==== 2012 ====
   * [[http://​caselaw.findlaw.com/​us-2nd-circuit/​1611250.html|Christian Louboutin v. Yves Saint Laurent America Holding Inc]]   * [[http://​caselaw.findlaw.com/​us-2nd-circuit/​1611250.html|Christian Louboutin v. Yves Saint Laurent America Holding Inc]]
-===== 2011 =====+==== 2011 ====
   * [[http://​www.austlii.edu.au/​cgi-bin/​sinodisp/​au/​cases/​cth/​FCA/​2011/​279.html|Organic Marketing Australia Pty Limited v Woolworths Limited]](( [2011] FCA 279))   * [[http://​www.austlii.edu.au/​cgi-bin/​sinodisp/​au/​cases/​cth/​FCA/​2011/​279.html|Organic Marketing Australia Pty Limited v Woolworths Limited]](( [2011] FCA 279))
-===== 2010 =====+==== 2010 ====
   * [[http://​www.austlii.edu.au/​cgi-bin/​sinodisp/​au/​cases/​cth/​HCA/​2010/​15.html|E & J Gallo Winery v Lion Nathan Australia Pty Ltd]](([2010] HCA 15 (19 May 2010) ))   * [[http://​www.austlii.edu.au/​cgi-bin/​sinodisp/​au/​cases/​cth/​HCA/​2010/​15.html|E & J Gallo Winery v Lion Nathan Australia Pty Ltd]](([2010] HCA 15 (19 May 2010) ))
     * Respondent sought removal of appellant'​s registered trade mark from Register for non-use during prescribed statutory period     * Respondent sought removal of appellant'​s registered trade mark from Register for non-use during prescribed statutory period
Line 33: Line 34:
     * Whether use in good faith.     * Whether use in good faith.
     * The principal issue raised on the appeal is whether, within the terms of [[http://​www.austlii.edu.au/​au/​legis/​cth/​consol_act/​tma1995121/​s101.html|s100(3)(a)]],​ there was use by Gallo or its predecessor in title, Mr Houlihan, of the registered trade mark in respect of wines, in good faith during the alleged statutory period. In our opinion, for the reasons which follow, there was such use.     * The principal issue raised on the appeal is whether, within the terms of [[http://​www.austlii.edu.au/​au/​legis/​cth/​consol_act/​tma1995121/​s101.html|s100(3)(a)]],​ there was use by Gallo or its predecessor in title, Mr Houlihan, of the registered trade mark in respect of wines, in good faith during the alleged statutory period. In our opinion, for the reasons which follow, there was such use.
-===== 1999 =====+==== 1999 ====
   * [[http://​www.austlii.edu.au/​cgi-bin/​sinodisp/​au/​cases/​cth/​FCA/​1999/​329.html|Transport Tyre Sales Pty Ltd v Montana Tyres Rims & Tubes Pty Ltd]]   * [[http://​www.austlii.edu.au/​cgi-bin/​sinodisp/​au/​cases/​cth/​FCA/​1999/​329.html|Transport Tyre Sales Pty Ltd v Montana Tyres Rims & Tubes Pty Ltd]]
-===== 1998 =====+==== 1998 ====
   * Blount Inc v Registrar of Trade Marks (((1998) 40 IPR 498))   * Blount Inc v Registrar of Trade Marks (((1998) 40 IPR 498))
-===== 1996 =====+==== 1996 ====
   * [[http://​www.austlii.edu.au/​cgi-bin/​sinodisp/​au/​cases/​cth/​FCA/​1996/​1484.html|Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation and Matt Groening Productions Inc v the South Australian Brewing Co Ltd and Lion Nathan Australia Pty Ltd]] (([1996] FCA 1484 (17 May 1996) ))   * [[http://​www.austlii.edu.au/​cgi-bin/​sinodisp/​au/​cases/​cth/​FCA/​1996/​1484.html|Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation and Matt Groening Productions Inc v the South Australian Brewing Co Ltd and Lion Nathan Australia Pty Ltd]] (([1996] FCA 1484 (17 May 1996) ))
  
-===== 1990 =====+==== 1990 ====
   * [[http://​www.austlii.edu.au/​cgi-bin/​sinodisp/​au/​cases/​cth/​FCA/​1990/​211.html|Re Dial An Angel Pty Limited v Sagitaur Services Systems Pty Limited]](([1990] FCA 211))   * [[http://​www.austlii.edu.au/​cgi-bin/​sinodisp/​au/​cases/​cth/​FCA/​1990/​211.html|Re Dial An Angel Pty Limited v Sagitaur Services Systems Pty Limited]](([1990] FCA 211))
     * On a literal reading of s52 of the Act, the deliberate creation by the breweries of an association by use of the name "​Duff"​ between the breweries'​ beer can with "The Simpsons'"​ program, in circumstances where there is no association and indeed, where such an association is contrary to the express policy of the producers, amounts to misleading and deceptive conduct. ​     * On a literal reading of s52 of the Act, the deliberate creation by the breweries of an association by use of the name "​Duff"​ between the breweries'​ beer can with "The Simpsons'"​ program, in circumstances where there is no association and indeed, where such an association is contrary to the express policy of the producers, amounts to misleading and deceptive conduct. ​
Line 47: Line 48:
     * .. I am satisfied on the balance of probabilities that consumers are in fact likely to assume sanction, permission or allowance on the part of the producers. ​     * .. I am satisfied on the balance of probabilities that consumers are in fact likely to assume sanction, permission or allowance on the part of the producers. ​
     * This is not caused by any erroneous assumption on their part, but by the deceptive conduct of the breweries.     * This is not caused by any erroneous assumption on their part, but by the deceptive conduct of the breweries.
-===== 1967 =====+==== 1967 ====
   * [[http://​www.austlii.edu.au/​au/​cases/​cth/​HCA/​1967/​51.html|Estex Clothing Manufacturers Pty Ltd v Ellis & Goldstein Ltd]](( [1967] HCA 51))   * [[http://​www.austlii.edu.au/​au/​cases/​cth/​HCA/​1967/​51.html|Estex Clothing Manufacturers Pty Ltd v Ellis & Goldstein Ltd]](( [1967] HCA 51))
   * [[http://​www.austlii.edu.au/​cgi-bin/​sinodisp/​au/​cases/​cth/​FCA/​1990/​211.html|The Shell Company of Australia Limited v Esso Standard Oil (Australia) Limited]] (([1963] HCA 66))   * [[http://​www.austlii.edu.au/​cgi-bin/​sinodisp/​au/​cases/​cth/​FCA/​1990/​211.html|The Shell Company of Australia Limited v Esso Standard Oil (Australia) Limited]] (([1963] HCA 66))
Line 73: Line 74:
       * An attempt should be made to estimate the effect or impression produced on the mind of potential customers by the mark or device for which the protection of an injunction is sought. ​       * An attempt should be made to estimate the effect or impression produced on the mind of potential customers by the mark or device for which the protection of an injunction is sought. ​
       * The impression or recollection which is carried away and retained is necessarily the basis of any mistaken belief that the challenged mark or device is the same'​." ​       * The impression or recollection which is carried away and retained is necessarily the basis of any mistaken belief that the challenged mark or device is the same'​." ​
-===== 1964 =====+==== 1964 ====
   * Clark Equipment Co. v Registrar of Trade Marks(((1964) 111 CLR 511))   * Clark Equipment Co. v Registrar of Trade Marks(((1964) 111 CLR 511))
-===== 1937 =====+==== 1937 ====
   * [[http://​www.austlii.edu.au/​au/​cases/​cth/​HCA/​1937/​36.html|Jafferjee v Scarlett]]((http://​www.austlii.edu.au/​au/​cases/​cth/​HCA/​1937/​36.html))   * [[http://​www.austlii.edu.au/​au/​cases/​cth/​HCA/​1937/​36.html|Jafferjee v Scarlett]]((http://​www.austlii.edu.au/​au/​cases/​cth/​HCA/​1937/​36.html))
-====== Trade Mark Articles ​======+===== Trade Mark Articles =====
   * [[http://​www.wipo.int/​edocs/​mdocs/​mdocs/​en/​wipo_ipr_ge_11/​wipo_ipr_ge_11_topic17.pdf|January 2011 - Trade Mark Protection – A Black Hole in the Intellectual Property Galaxy? ​ Martin Senftleben]]   * [[http://​www.wipo.int/​edocs/​mdocs/​mdocs/​en/​wipo_ipr_ge_11/​wipo_ipr_ge_11_topic17.pdf|January 2011 - Trade Mark Protection – A Black Hole in the Intellectual Property Galaxy? ​ Martin Senftleben]]

  © White SW Computer Law 1994-2019. ABN 94 669 684 644. All Rights Reserved.
  Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation
  This website is a guide only and should not be used as a substitute for proper legal advice.
  Readers should make their own enquiries and seek appropriate legal advice.
  For legal advice please email wcl@computerlaw.com.au