White SW Computer Law
Intellectual Property, Information Technology & Telecommunications Lawyers
Melbourne Office - PO Box 452, COLLINS STREET WEST Victoria 8007 Australia
Sydney Office - GPO Box 2506, SYDNEY New South Wales 2001 Australia
Telephone: Melbourne Office - +61 3 9629 3709 Sydney Office - +61 2 9233 2600
Facsimile: Melbourne Office - +61 3 9629 3217 Sydney Office - +61 2 9233 3044
Email: wcl@computerlaw.com.au Internet: http://www.computerlaw.com.au

User Tools

Site Tools


nljul10

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
nljul10 [2011/10/26 10:26]
steve
nljul10 [2017/07/30 18:03] (current)
Line 9: Line 9:
 This risk may be reduced by the company stating that it is not the source of the information,​ expressly or impliedly disclaiming any belief in its truth or falsity and advising that the company is merely passing on the information for what it is worth((//​[[case_links::#​Yorke v Lucas|Yorke v Lucas]]// [1985] HCA 65, para 38; as cited in //​[[case_links::#​Granitgard P/L v Termicide Pest Control P/L (No 5)|Granitgard P/L v Termicide Pest Control P/L]]//, para 46)). This risk may be reduced by the company stating that it is not the source of the information,​ expressly or impliedly disclaiming any belief in its truth or falsity and advising that the company is merely passing on the information for what it is worth((//​[[case_links::#​Yorke v Lucas|Yorke v Lucas]]// [1985] HCA 65, para 38; as cited in //​[[case_links::#​Granitgard P/L v Termicide Pest Control P/L (No 5)|Granitgard P/L v Termicide Pest Control P/L]]//, para 46)).
  
-The court will consider the company’s conduct as a whole, including issues such as the use of disclaimers((//​[[case_links::#​Yorke v Lucas|Yorke v Lucas]]// [1985] HCA 65, para 39; as cited in //​[[case_links::#​Granitgard P/L v Termicide Pest Control P/L (No 5)|Granitgard P/L v Termicide Pest Control P/L]]//, para 46)).+The Court will consider the company’s conduct as a whole, including issues such as the use of disclaimers((//​[[case_links::#​Yorke v Lucas|Yorke v Lucas]]// [1985] HCA 65, para 39; as cited in //​[[case_links::#​Granitgard P/L v Termicide Pest Control P/L (No 5)|Granitgard P/L v Termicide Pest Control P/L]]//, para 46)).
  
 The Federal Court considered these issues in //​[[case_links::#​Granitgard P/L v Termicide Pest Control P/L (No 5)|Granitgard P/L v Termicide Pest Control P/L]]// (No.5)(([2010] FCA 313)), a dispute between two competitor firms, both of whom supply termite barrier systems. The Federal Court considered these issues in //​[[case_links::#​Granitgard P/L v Termicide Pest Control P/L (No 5)|Granitgard P/L v Termicide Pest Control P/L]]// (No.5)(([2010] FCA 313)), a dispute between two competitor firms, both of whom supply termite barrier systems.

  © White SW Computer Law 1994-2019. ABN 94 669 684 644. All Rights Reserved.
  Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation
  This website is a guide only and should not be used as a substitute for proper legal advice.
  Readers should make their own enquiries and seek appropriate legal advice.
  For legal advice please email wcl@computerlaw.com.au