White SW Computer Law
Intellectual Property, Information Technology & Telecommunications Lawyers
Melbourne Office - PO Box 452, COLLINS STREET WEST Victoria 8007 Australia
Sydney Office - GPO Box 2506, SYDNEY New South Wales 2001 Australia
Telephone: Melbourne Office - +61 3 9629 3709 Sydney Office - +61 2 9233 2600
Facsimile: Melbourne Office - +61 3 9629 3217 Sydney Office - +61 2 9233 3044
Email: wcl@computerlaw.com.au Internet: http://www.computerlaw.com.au

User Tools

Site Tools


nljul10

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
nljul10 [2011/10/26 10:26]
steve
nljul10 [2017/07/30 18:03] (current)
Line 9: Line 9:
 This risk may be reduced by the company stating that it is not the source of the information,​ expressly or impliedly disclaiming any belief in its truth or falsity and advising that the company is merely passing on the information for what it is worth((//​[[case_links::#​Yorke v Lucas|Yorke v Lucas]]// [1985] HCA 65, para 38; as cited in //​[[case_links::#​Granitgard P/L v Termicide Pest Control P/L (No 5)|Granitgard P/L v Termicide Pest Control P/L]]//, para 46)). This risk may be reduced by the company stating that it is not the source of the information,​ expressly or impliedly disclaiming any belief in its truth or falsity and advising that the company is merely passing on the information for what it is worth((//​[[case_links::#​Yorke v Lucas|Yorke v Lucas]]// [1985] HCA 65, para 38; as cited in //​[[case_links::#​Granitgard P/L v Termicide Pest Control P/L (No 5)|Granitgard P/L v Termicide Pest Control P/L]]//, para 46)).
  
-The court will consider the company’s conduct as a whole, including issues such as the use of disclaimers((//​[[case_links::#​Yorke v Lucas|Yorke v Lucas]]// [1985] HCA 65, para 39; as cited in //​[[case_links::#​Granitgard P/L v Termicide Pest Control P/L (No 5)|Granitgard P/L v Termicide Pest Control P/L]]//, para 46)).+The Court will consider the company’s conduct as a whole, including issues such as the use of disclaimers((//​[[case_links::#​Yorke v Lucas|Yorke v Lucas]]// [1985] HCA 65, para 39; as cited in //​[[case_links::#​Granitgard P/L v Termicide Pest Control P/L (No 5)|Granitgard P/L v Termicide Pest Control P/L]]//, para 46)).
  
 The Federal Court considered these issues in //​[[case_links::#​Granitgard P/L v Termicide Pest Control P/L (No 5)|Granitgard P/L v Termicide Pest Control P/L]]// (No.5)(([2010] FCA 313)), a dispute between two competitor firms, both of whom supply termite barrier systems. The Federal Court considered these issues in //​[[case_links::#​Granitgard P/L v Termicide Pest Control P/L (No 5)|Granitgard P/L v Termicide Pest Control P/L]]// (No.5)(([2010] FCA 313)), a dispute between two competitor firms, both of whom supply termite barrier systems.

  © White SW Computer Law 1994-2019. ABN 94 669 684 644. All Rights Reserved.
  Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation
  This website is a guide only and should not be used as a substitute for proper legal advice.
  Readers should make their own enquiries and seek appropriate legal advice.
  For legal advice please email wcl@computerlaw.com.au