White SW Computer Law
Intellectual Property, Information Technology & Telecommunications Lawyers
Melbourne Office - PO Box 452, COLLINS STREET WEST Victoria 8007 Australia
Sydney Office - GPO Box 2506, SYDNEY New South Wales 2001 Australia
Telephone: Melbourne Office - +61 3 9629 3709 Sydney Office - +61 2 9233 2600
Facsimile: Melbourne Office - +61 3 9629 3217 Sydney Office - +61 2 9233 3044
Email: wcl@computerlaw.com.au Internet: http://www.computerlaw.com.au

User Tools

Site Tools


injunctions

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

injunctions [2011/07/07 18:19]
steve
injunctions [2017/07/30 18:02]
Line 1: Line 1:
-====== Injunctions ====== 
-====== Cases ====== 
-  * [[http://​www.bailii.org/​uk/​cases/​UKHL/​1975/​1.html|February 5, 1975 - American Cyanamid Co (No 1) v Ethicon Ltd [1975] UKHL 1]] 
-    * Leading UK decision on injunctions 
-    * concerned a patent for the use as absorbable surgical sutures of filaments made of a particular kind of chain polymer known as " a polyhydroxyacetic ester" ("​PHAE"​). These are sutures of a kind that disintegrate and are absorbed by the human body once they have served their purpose 
-    * The case determined the benchmark for an an interlocutory injunction 
-      * "a **serious question** to be tried" 
-      * "​balance of convenience"​ 
-      * undertaking as to damages ​ 
-    * This case was a [[quia timet]] injunction. 
-  ​ 
  

  © White SW Computer Law 1994-2019. ABN 94 669 684 644. All Rights Reserved.
  Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation
  This website is a guide only and should not be used as a substitute for proper legal advice.
  Readers should make their own enquiries and seek appropriate legal advice.
  For legal advice please email wcl@computerlaw.com.au